Governing Conversations

Yale Information Society Project and Digital Interests Lab event series

Technology governance issues are now at the forefront of national and global news. Interdisciplinary by nature and with wide-ranging applications, governance scholarship is thus transitioning into a consequential but poorly-defined space.

Co-created by the Digital Interests Lab at NYU, and the Information Society Project at Yale Law School, the Governing Conversations series aims to provide scholars in the field and interested audiences alike a time for genuine reflection and critical perspectives, without the need for a connection to recent events, or academic presentations. 

Short of an agenda-setting event, the series sets up three interconnected but distinct themes that can galvanize a better shared understanding of governance research and its role across society.

The series will feature 9 conversations spread out over three themes, each featuring a mix of junior and senior scholars with relevant experience exploring both substantive and professional issues across all three.

Platform Governance, co-sponsored by the UCLA Institute for Technology Law and Policy, kicked off in the Fall of 2021, with events in December 2021, January and February 2022. Access & Accessibility, co-sponsored by the American University’s Internet Governance Lab & Institute on Disability and Public Policy will kick off in the Spring of 2022, with events in April, May and June 2022, with speakers being announced soon. Cybersecurity will take place in Summer 2022.

Access & Accessibility

Co-Sponsored by American University’s Internet Governance Lab & Institute on Disability and Public Policy
April 2022 – June 2022

I. Disability, Law & the Internet

April 21st 2022

Connecting the world through the internet implies the expectation of accessibility, which is essential to the inclusion and empowerment of over one billion people with disabilities worldwide. How that happens relies on different frameworks, with a key moment in implementation, and a focus on the actors in charge. Where does that responsibility lie at the international and national levels? Where should it lie? While focused on the legal aspects of ensuring accessibility on the internet, the conversation around disability can benefit from interventions outside of legal avenues as well. In light of this, our panelists will also discuss the perspective of accommodations in contrast to approaches inspired by universal design principles.  

Tina Kempin-Reuter , Associate Professor, University of Alabama Birmingham

Arlene Mayerson, Herma Hill Kay Lecturer, University of California Berkeley, Law School
Blake Reid, Clinical Professor, University of Colorado Boulder Law School.
Doron Dorfman, Associate Professor of Law, Syracuse University College of Law

Register here!

II. Class, Geography & Internet Access

May 19th 2022

The institutional aspect of access and accessibility is one deeply rooted in the concept of the digital divide, across socio-economic groups, and geographic distribution. Control of the internet, its governing elements, especially through the lens of current events, is a central part of this conversation. How do disadvantaged users get internet access without acceding to the intrusive surveillance practices of certain Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and governments, particularly in non-democratic contexts? Our panelists will discuss whether governance at the institutional level around the world can play a role in breaking the cycle of neglect, while also safeguarding important rights like privacy. 

Filippo Trevisan , Associate Professor, American University

Jenifer Sunrise Winter, Professor, University Hawaii Manoa
Fernanda Rosa, Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech University
Ever Bussey, Digital Equity Lab Research Coordinator, New School

Register here!

III. Digital Divide, Culture & Intersectionality

June 30th 2022

While ostensibly geared towards governance, the individual and societal levels are key to understanding how the digital divide affects access, accessibility, and (dis-)empowerment. Third level digital divide scholarship broadens our horizon by considering the socio-economic outcomes of different internet uses and non-uses, and tackles tech design as a lynchpin in choices made by disadvantaged users. Our panelists will focus on social groups and the different uses of technology, on the sociological aspects of internet access and use, and on the roles – both positive and negative – that societal structures and culture can play in shaping these experiences and their outcomes.  

Speakers to be announced soon.


Summer 2022

Previous Themes

Platform Governance

Co-Sponsored by UCLA Institute for Technology Law & Policy
December 2021 – February 2022

I. Trust and Transparency

December 10th 2021

Civil society and government stakeholders have very low trust in industry, based on repeated violations of the latter’s own promises. Concurrently, information asymmetry is an initial hurdle to both studying and proposing solutions for platform governance. However, as with everything in this space, the answer is rarely as simple as it may seem at first glance. Transparency, a necessary first step, may end up enabling bad actors, may inadvertently compromise privacy, and ultimately can become a substitute for meaningful policy change. Do systems need to be fully rebuilt in order to restore a sense of balance, or is that balance a red herring? Is the solution policy, tech, both, neither?

Jill Bronfman, Adjunct Professor of Law, University of California Hastings

Hannah Bloch-Wehba, Associate Professor of Law, Texas A&M University
Neil Richards, Koch Distinguished Professor in Law, Washington University in Saint Louis
Zahra Takhshid, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Denver

Register here.

II. Self- and Co-Governance

January 19th 2022

An argument can be made that in a legislative environment like the one in the US, the government may not be able to fully tackle the myriad problems that digital platforms bring on, and that the solution should come from a buffet of options. The answer thus is that on some things industry is, or should be responsible for governing itself, while on others all stakeholders should have a say. Is that still a legitimate perspective? Is that the case in other environments where the government is not as restricted?

Courtney Radsch, Postdoctoral Fellow, UCLA

Bruna Santos, Alexander von Humboldt’s German Chancellor Fellow, Berlin Social Science Center
Nanjala Nyabola, Practitioner Fellow, Stanford PACS
Jason Pielemeier, Deputy Director, Global Network Initiative
Ethan Zuckerman, Associate Professor of Public Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Register here.

III. Equity and Accountability

February 23rd 2022

There is a crisis of accountability not just in platform governance in particular, but within platforms in general. Several waves of purported silver bullets, be they through technology, humanity, or ethics, have failed to bring about a true overhaul of the problematic systems in question, offering fleeting small victories instead. How does equity go beyond a performative structure? Can a different way of conceptualizing technology bring about a better environment? Do governance scholars have a responsibility for previous failures?

Elettra Bietti, Joint PostDoctoral Fellow, NYU Law and Cornell Tech

Ettienne Toussaint, Assistant Professor of Law, University of South Carolina
Estelle Masse, Europe Legislative Manager, Access Now
Achuta Kadambi, Assistant Professor of Engineering, UCLA

Register here.